| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |
Sinder Ohm
Infinite Improbability Inc
Mostly Harmless
   |
Posted - 2007.10.21 17:16:00 -
[1]
The Titan nerf I can understand, that dictor bubbles affected super capitals was also needed but this 
I mean comon guys you give us big expensive toys that take friggin ages to train for and then you turn around and nerf them into uslessness, so future use for MS and carriers according to CCP will be sitting at a POS delegating fighters 
I recall you wanting us to use them more on the frontline, this change will cause the exact opposite.. way to go CCP 
 Originally by: Karanth
Wimps play empire. Real men play in 0.0. Hardcore masochists live out in drone space.
|
Sinder Ohm
Infinite Improbability Inc
Mostly Harmless
|
Posted - 2007.10.21 21:53:00 -
[2]
Did Zulupark lose a drinking bet?? I mean seriously basically what you are proposing is a domi with lots of HP. and wtf is the use of asigning fighters when it takes ages to load grid cos of the lag.
Take a hint fix lag first then non cap ship pilots get a chance to warp out before they get bbqed by fighters + insane lag.
The big problems here are
1. MS pwning in low sec, they shouldnt be allowed to imo
2. Fighterswarms and lag = couldnt warp out in time where did my ship go
fix the problems and dont make new ones.
Originally by: Karanth
Wimps play empire. Real men play in 0.0. Hardcore masochists live out in drone space.
|
Sinder Ohm
Infinite Improbability Inc
Mostly Harmless
|
Posted - 2007.10.22 13:58:00 -
[3]
Ok so you are going to reduce the direct damage dealt by MS and carriers DRASTICALLY.
You may aswell do the full monty and give all BS and BC only 2 - 4 weapon points so that BS are balanced again with MS and carriers. Comon you know you want to do it break your own game.
Originally by: Karanth
Wimps play empire. Real men play in 0.0. Hardcore masochists live out in drone space.
|
Sinder Ohm
Infinite Improbability Inc
Mostly Harmless
|
Posted - 2007.10.22 14:30:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Kerfira
Edited by: Kerfira on 22/10/2007 14:01:53
I tried looking into the future a bit after this nerf, and what I saw in my crystal ball was this dev blog.
Originally by: Future Dev Blog
Hi, I'm Zalapurk and recently transferred from the Quality Assurance department to the Game Design team. IÆve been with CCP for just under two years now and donÆt plan on going anywhere. Say hello to your newest balancer (I still haven't received a nerfbat though).
I'm posting here now because the last few days we've been looking at the way battleships are functioning on Tranquility, and to be honest weære a little concerned with the direction itæs taking.
What we want is pretty basic: We want to make battleships more reliant on their support fleet and less of a direct nber deathbringer.
How are we going to do it?
Well, we have an idea, and before you go ballistic remember that this is an idea and weære still working on it:
We plan on changing the way guns work, and have it so that you can still have all the guns you want (within limits of your ship/skills) but you can only directly fire 2 of them at a time. That means that a battleship can assign 2 guns to a gang mate, assign 2 more to another gang mate etc. etc.
This means you will NOT be able to fire 6/7/8 guns from a battleship and aim them all to incinerate a cruiser in .2 seconds. It does however mean that you can assign 2 guns to each of your lilæ friends in the fleet and use them as the messengers of your burning fury.
Remember, weære not messing with the final total amount of guns you can have, just the amount you can control and delegate at a time. You can of course also operate 2 guns and make them attack a target of your own choice, if it pleases you.
HAHAHA  thats gold great post dude! 
Originally by: Karanth
Wimps play empire. Real men play in 0.0. Hardcore masochists live out in drone space.
|
Sinder Ohm
Infinite Improbability Inc
Mostly Harmless
|
Posted - 2007.10.22 16:40:00 -
[5]
I loved this game for the entire time I played it, but it looks like EvE is going SWG. If CCP ignore this 59 page (LOL prolly 60 by the time I finish this post) then I am sorry it makes me very sad it really does.
I will have to say goodbye and thanks for all the fish
I am all out of cronsctrucitve criticism tbh mainly because I am really peed off and the fact that any normal logical person would see that making a very time intensive and expensive ship equal to that of a ship that costs a fraction of the amount of money and invested time is just not logical. So whats the point of posting constructive criticism when it gets dismissed as biased opinion.
|
Sinder Ohm
Infinite Improbability Inc
Mostly Harmless
|
Posted - 2007.10.22 16:53:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Sertan Deras
Originally by: Recluse Viramor
=o
No one can bring together a BoB and a Goon like CCP can.
and totally /signed, I was burned by SOE with SWG and I don't like the way CCP has been treating the playerbase lately...
This should be CCP's new litmus test. If Goons AND BoB are agreeing with each other that your idea is stupid, it's probably stupid.
That had me laughing out loud for a few minutes I have copied the quote and may use it later if you dont mind, its gold
|
Sinder Ohm
Infinite Improbability Inc
Mostly Harmless
|
Posted - 2007.10.24 08:53:00 -
[7]
CCP if you think carriers are such pwnmobiles then please do the following:
1. Log into TQ
2. Form a carrier/ms gang with NO support in 0.0
3. Inform Tri or any other well known cap killer alliance where you are
4. Fight said alliance in your unsuported MS/carrier gang
5. Come back and tell us they are still overpowered
and that was a very poor attempt at dmg control Kieron. not sure what that was but it didnt work you can still consider me an ex customer if this happends.
|
| |
|